Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Jack Draper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rijthoven vs Draper analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Jack Draper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 1 - 1 Draper
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rijthoven has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Draper has won 50.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rijthoven, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Draper has won 51.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rijthoven has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Draper has saved 57.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rijthoven has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Draper winning 64.91% (W/L 37/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rijthoven winning 1 times and Draper being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rijthoven winning 2 and Draper winning 2. The last match between Rijthoven and Draper was at the Forli 4 Challenger, 20-02-2022, Final, I.hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rijthoven and Draper have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rijthoven winning 0 times and Draper 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rijthoven winning 0, and Draper 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rijthoven has played against opponents with an average rank of while Draper has played against players with an average rank of 159.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rijthoven has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Draper has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rijthoven has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Draper has converted 46.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
871
Rank
101
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
40
Rank
35
High
22
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
62% (234-141)
Career Total W/L
68% (203-94)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$499,600
Career Prize Money
$1,468,300
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 15 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:53 | 1:6:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (68/93) | 61% (64/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (50/68) | 77% (49/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 49% (20/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (36/105) | 35% (33/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Jack Draper
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (39/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (366/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 182 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:6:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 106.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (1194/2077) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (911/1194) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (442/883) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (87/187) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (804/2137) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (10/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Sebastian Ofner
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
8
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
41 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Draper
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Borna Coric
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Rijthoven Vs Draper Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rijthoven are available here and Draper photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tim Van Rijthoven
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
